|
Short Sales Are Still A Major Irritant
|
|
Tuesday, 08 February 2011 12:35
| by Bob Hunt Concern, frustration, and a fair bit of anger were all sentiments that emerged during discussions of short sales that took place during the recent meetings of the California Association of Realtors® (CAR) in San Diego, Calif. These were not just hallway discussions or after-hours conversations. Short sales were the topic of a variety of different committee meetings and were the subject of action items at the business meeting of the full Board of Directors.
The subject, of course, is not new. CAR has been actively involved in support of various legislative measures related to short sales. Members and task forces have met with both state and federal legislators and regulators, as well as with representatives from major lending institutions.
In December, CAR president Beth Peerce wrote on behalf of the 170,000 member organization to the Treasury Secretary, Acting Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, and the CEOs of both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In addition to making recommendations about specific aspects of the so-far unsuccessful HAFA program, she also urged that “…Treasury should set forth the underwriting guidelines to which servicers and lenders must adhere. The government’s unwillingness to mandate action by lenders to stem the current housing crisis relegates HAFA to yet another well-intentioned voluntary program, which servicers, lenders, and investors are all too happy to ignore, and which C.A.R. fears will fail.”
While meetings between CAR officers and representatives from major lenders have been, as they say, both frank and cordial, they have yet to result in significant, discernible improvements to short sale processes. At the San Diego meetings CAR Directors authorized funds for an “open letter” campaign in major news outlets. Additionally, CAR will be working with NAR to seek federal legislation addressing a variety of short sale issues.
Lending institutions were not the only target of frustration and occasional anger. Many of the Realtors® in attendance also had some venting to do in the direction of certain of their colleagues. The issue du jour was short sale negotiators (SSNs).
|
|
|
Thursday, 20 January 2011 15:24
| As you peruse the real estate ads searching for your dream home, you have undoubtedly come across many ads touting that there are no "Mello-Roos" in connection with that particular property. But what exactly does that mean?
HISTORY OF MELLO-ROOS
In 1978, California enacted Proposition 13, which limited many local public agencies' ability to finance new infrastructure projects. Before Proposition 13, state and local governments used income from property taxes to build new roads, schools and other necessary community facilities in order to continue growing residential areas. In order to create another way for such projects to be financed, Senator Henry J. Mello and former Assemblyman Michael Roos won passage of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act in 1982, which allowed for the creation of Mello-Roos Community Facilities Districts as a way to assist cities, counties and school districts with new infrastructure by imposing a special tax on real property owners within the Districts.
WHAT ARE MELLO-ROOS TAXES USED FOR?
The taxes may be used for both services and facilities. Services may include police protection, fire protection, ambulance and paramedic services, recreation program services, library services, and operation and maintenance of parks, parkways and open space. Facilities which may be financed include parks, recreation facilities, elementary and secondary school site and structure, libraries, child-care facilities, natural gas pipeline facilities, telephone and cable television lines, streets, sidewalks and sewers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |